• Ms. Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Marc. Gr. Z. 453 (821) metadata
  • Material: parchment
  • Bookformat: codex
  • Page dimensions: cm 40,5 x 31,5
  • Hand(s) and date: 1st hand 11th c., responsible of both the Homeric text and frame scholia; 2nd hand 12th-13th c. (*B Erbse), responsible of the addition of D-scholia and glosses drawn from lexica and Epimerismi; the same hand, or another one slightly later, added in the far margins extracts from Prophyry’s Homeric Questions and Ps.-Heraclitus’ Homeric Allegories; 3rd hand, 14th c., responsible of extracts from the Etymologicum Magnum, Suda, Epimerismi Homerici, and further grammatical works.
  • Provenance: Constantinople
  • Owner: Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana
  • Catalogue: Zanetti – Bongiovanni 1740, 243-244; Mioni 1985, 235-236.
  • Print images: Maniaci 2000, pl. 10 (f. 14r); Maniaci 2006, tav. 1 (f. 121r), tav. 4 (f. 22r); Maniaci 2021, figg. 2, 7 (f. 117r).
  • Digital images: https://www.internetculturale.it/jmms/iccuviewer/iccu.jsp?id=oai%3A193.206.197.121%3A18%3AVE0049%3ACSTOR.240.10163
  • https://www.homermultitext.org/codex-browser/
  • Literary works attested: Homer, Iliad, with marginal scholia; AP. 9.385; Porphyrius’ Homeric Questions on the Iliad (extracts); Ps.-Heraclitus, Homeric Allegories (extracts).
  • Editions: Villoison 1788; Bekker 1825; Dindorf 1875-1877, vol. III and vol. IV, 362-389; Erbse 1969-1988 (Homeric scholia); Schrader 1880-1882, 1-278; Sodano 1970; MacPhail 2011 (Porphyry); Russell – Konstan 2005 (Ps.-Heraclitus).
  • Sample page: f. 67r: Homer, Il. 5.211-234 with marginal scholia.
  • Type of paratext: anonymous scholia, mainly of the class of the exegetica.
  • Text–paratext relationship: the 1st hand copied the poetical text and the frame of scholia, distributed in the upper, external, and lower margins. The 1st hand scholia are connected to the text thanks to a number sequence, which starts from α΄ at the beginning of each verso and continues till the end of the corresponding recto. Only in exceptional cases, the 1st hand interposes scholia connected to the literary text through symbols among those with the number system, often not in keeping with the sequence of the Homeric text (cf. Maniaci 2006, 287 ff.). The additions made by subsequent hands are connected to the text thanks to symbols and generally appear as close as possible to the line where the commented part is to be found, regardless of whether this causes a sequence of scholia which is not consistent with that of the literary text. No lemma is present.
  • Repertories: Arca 32774; Diktyon 69924.
  • Bibliography: Allen 1931; Anderson 2011, 191-192; Blackwell – Dué – Ebbott – Smith 2014; Calvié 2017; Castelli 2016; Diller 1960; Dindorf 1875-1877, vol. III and vol. IV, 362-389; Erbse 1960, 3-77; Ludwich 1884-1885, I, 85-102; MacPhail 2011, 8; Maniaci 2000; Maniaci 2006; Maniaci 2021; Marcon 2013, 561; Montana 2020; Morantin 2017; Pagani 2020; Pontani 2011, 70, 183-184 and n. 407, 368 n. 850; Pontani 2016, 317; Roemer 1879; Sabbadini 1967, 46; Schrader 1880-1882, I, VII-VIII; Sodano 1970, XI-XII; van der Valk 1963-1964.